1. Home
  2. VMware
  3. VMware VCP
  4. 2V0-13.24 Exam Info

VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Questions - Navigate Your Path to Success

The VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam (2V0-13.24) exam is a good choice for VMWare Cloud Architects and Administrators and if the candidate manages to pass VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam, he/she will earn VMware VCP, VMware VCP-VCF Architect Certifications. Below are some essential facts for VMware 2V0-13.24 exam candidates:

  • In actual VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam (2V0-13.24) exam, a candidate can expect 60 Questions and the officially allowed time is expected to be around 135 Minutes.
  • TrendyCerts offers 90 Questions that are based on actual VMware 2V0-13.24 syllabus.
  • Our VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Practice Questions were last updated on: Mar 05, 2025

Sample Questions for VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Preparation

Question 1

An architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based private cloud solution for a customer. During the requirements gathering workshop, the customer provided the following requirement:

All SSL certificates should be provided by the company's certificate authority.

When creating the design, how should the architect classify this stated requirement?

Correct : B

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, requirements are classified using design qualities as defined in VMware's architectural methodology: Availability, Manageability, Performance, Recoverability, and Security. These qualities help architects align customer needs with technical solutions. The requirement specifies that ''all SSL certificates should be provided by the company's certificate authority,'' which involves encryption, identity verification, and trust management. Let's classify it:

Option A: Recoverability

Recoverability focuses on restoring services after failures, such as disaster recovery (DR) or failover (e.g., RTO, RPO). SSL certificates relate to securing communication, not recovery processes. The VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide defines Recoverability as pertaining to system restoration, not certificate management, making this incorrect.

Option B: Security

Security encompasses protecting the system from threats, ensuring data confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity. Requiring SSL certificates from the company's certificate authority (CA) directly relates to securing VCF components (e.g., vCenter, NSX, SDDC Manager) by enforcing trusted, organization-specific encryption and authentication. The VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide classifies certificate usage under Security, as it mitigates risks like man-in-the-middle attacks and aligns with compliance standards (e.g., PCI-DSS, if applicable). This is the correct classification.

Option C: Availability

Availability ensures system uptime and fault tolerance (e.g., HA, redundancy). While SSL certificates enable secure access, they don't directly influence uptime or failover. The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide ties Availability to resilience mechanisms (e.g., clustered deployments), not security controls like certificates.

Option D: Manageability

Manageability focuses on operational ease (e.g., monitoring, automation). Using a company CA involves certificate deployment and renewal, which could relate to management processes. However, the primary intent is securing communication, not simplifying administration. VMware documentation distinguishes certificate-related requirements as Security, not Manageability, unless explicitly about operational workflows.

Conclusion:

The requirement is best classified as Security (B), as it addresses the secure configuration of SSL certificates, a core security concern in VCF 5.2.


VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide (docs.vmware.com): Section on Design Qualities (Security, Recoverability, etc.).

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Design Guide (docs.vmware.com): Certificate Management and Security Classification.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide (docs.vmware.com): SSL Certificate Configuration.

Options Selected by Other Users:
Question 2

A VMware Cloud Foundation multi-AZ (Availability Zone) design requires that:

All management components remain centralized.

The availability SLA must be no less than 99.99%.

Which two design decisions would help meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

Correct : C, E

The requirements specify centralized management components and a 99.99% availability SLA (allowing ~52 minutes of downtime per year) in a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 multi-AZ design. In VCF, management components (e.g., SDDC Manager, vCenter, NSX Manager) are typically deployed in a Management Domain, and multi-AZ designs leverage availability zones for resilience. Let's evaluate each option:

Option A: Implement a stretched L2 VLAN for the infrastructure management components between the AZs

A stretched L2 VLAN extends network segments across AZs, potentially supporting centralized management. However, it doesn't inherently ensure 99.99% availability without additional HA mechanisms (e.g., vSphere HA, NSX clustering). The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide notes that L2 stretching alone lacks failover orchestration and may introduce latency or single points of failure if not paired with a stretched cluster, making it insufficient here.

Option B: Select two distant AZs and configure separate management workload domains

Separate management workload domains in distant AZs decentralize management components (e.g., separate SDDC Managers, vCenters), violating the requirement for centralization. The VCF 5.2 Administration Guide states that multiple management domains increase complexity and don't inherently meet high availability SLAs without cross-site replication, ruling this out.

Option C: Implement VMware Live Recovery between the selected AZs

VMware Live Recovery (part of VMware's DR portfolio, integrating Site Recovery Manager and vSphere Replication) provides disaster recovery across AZs. It ensures centralized management components (in one AZ) can fail over to a secondary AZ, maintaining an RTO/RPO that supports 99.99% availability when properly configured (e.g., <5-minute failover with replication). The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide recommends Live Recovery for multi-AZ resilience while keeping management centralized, making it a strong fit.

Option D: Implement separate VLANs for the infrastructure management components within each AZ

Separate VLANs per AZ enhance network isolation but imply distributed management components across AZs, contradicting the centralized requirement. Even if management is centralized in one AZ, separate VLANs don't directly improve availability to 99.99% without HA or DR mechanisms, per the VCF 5.2 Networking Guide.

Option E: Select two close proximity AZs and configure a stretched management workload domain

A stretched management workload domain spans two close AZs (e.g., <10ms latency) using vSphere HA, vSAN stretched clusters, and NSX federation. This keeps management components centralized (single SDDC Manager, vCenter) while achieving 99.99% availability through synchronous replication and automatic failover. The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guide highlights stretched clusters as a best practice for multi-AZ designs, ensuring minimal downtime (e.g., seconds during host/AZ failure), meeting the SLA.

Conclusion:

C: VMware Live Recovery enables centralized management with DR failover, supporting 99.99% availability.

E: A stretched management domain in close AZs ensures centralized, highly available management with near-zero downtime.

These decisions align with VCF 5.2 multi-AZ best practices.


VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide (docs.vmware.com): Multi-AZ Design and Stretched Clusters.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide (docs.vmware.com): Management Domain Resilience.

VMware Live Recovery Documentation (docs.vmware.com): DR for VCF Environments.

Options Selected by Other Users:
VMware 2V0-13.24